Perhitungan Emisi Gas Pesawat Udara pada Fase Taxi-Out dengan Operasi Satu Mesin Mati di Bandar Udara Soekarno-Hatta

Article Sidebar

PDF (Indonesian)
Published: 2021-02-25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25104/wa.v46i2.389.110-121
Keywords:
Penerbangan, emisi pesawat udara, taxi-out, single-engine taxiing

Main Article Content

Minda Mora
Pusat Litbang Transportasi Udara
Susanti Susanti
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Transportasi Udara

Abstract

Pesawat udara mengeluarkan emisi gas di setiap fase penerbangan, khususnya pada fase taxi-out. Makalah ini bertujuan untuk menghitung emisi gas pesawat udara pada saat taxi-out dengan menggunakan data operasional harian aktual pesawat udara di Bandar Udara Soekarno-Hatta dan melakukan evaluasi potensi pengurangan emisi apabila fase taxi-out dilakukan dengan strategi operasi satu mesin pesawat udara mati. Emisi gas pesawat udara dihitung dengan menggunakan metode hybrid berdasarkan formula yang direferensikan dalam International Civil Aviation Organization Airport Air Quality Manual. Perhitungan emisi gas pesawat udara dilakukan pada setiap penerbangan domestik, internasional dan kargo di Bandar Udara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta pada bulan Januari sampai dengan Juli tahun 2019. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi dengan operasi satu mesin mati memberikan potensi pengurangan emisi gas pesawat udara sebesar 37% s.d 40%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 46 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Article
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Barrett, M. (2004). POLLUTION CONTROL STRATEGIES for WWF International.

California Air Resources. (1978). Evaluation of emission control strategies for airfield operation at the los angeles and san francisco international airports. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/a7-077-30.pdf

Crippa, M., Oreggioni, G., D, G., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Lo Vullo, E., Solazzo, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Olivier, J. G. ., & Vignati, E. (2019). Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries - 2019 Report Publications Office of the EU. https://doi.org/10.2760/687800

Deonandan, I., & Balakrishnan, H. (2010). Evaluation of strategies for reducing taxi-out emissions at airports. 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference 2010, ATIO 2010, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-9370

Gelinas, C. G., & Fan, H. S. L. (1979). Reducing Air Pollutant Emissions at Airports by Controlling Aircraft Ground Operations. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 29(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1979.10470766

Graver, B., Zhang, K., & Rutherford, D. (2019). 3CO2 emissions from commercial aviation, 2018. International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019, September, 13.

ICAO. (2011). International Civil Aviation Organization Airport Air Quality Manual. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/Publications/FINAL.Doc 9889.1st Edition.alltext.en.pdf

ICAO. (2019). ICAO global environmental trends – Present and future aircraft noise and emissions. Icao, July, 1–8. https://www.icao.int/Meetings/A40/Documents/WP/wp_054_en.pdf

Miller, B., Minoque, K., & Clarke, J. (2000). Constraints in aviation infrastructure and surface aircraft emissions. January 2001, 1–15.

Mora, M. &, & Yusman, T. (2014). Pengaruh Kepadatan Lalu Lintas Penerbangan Pada Saat Taxi-Out Terhadap Konsumsi Bahan Bakar Pesawat Udara ( Studi Kasus : Bandar Udara Internasional Soekarno Hatta ) The Effect of Air Traffic Congestion on Taxi-out Time and Aircraft Fuel Consumption ( Cas. Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Warta Ardhia, 40(4), 215–222.

Norton, T. M. (2014). Aircraft Greenhouse Gas Emissions during the Landing and Takeoff Cycle at Bay Area Airports. 45. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/15/?utm_source=repository.usfca.edu/capstone/15&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Pejovic, T., Noland, R. B., Williams, V., & Toumi, R. (2008). Estimates of UK CO2 emissions from aviation using air traffic data. Climatic Change, 88(3–4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9370-0